Olmec jadeite mask 1000–600 BCE |
Olmec alternative origin speculations are
explanations that have been suggested for the formation of Olmec civilization
which contradict generally accepted scholarly consensus. These origin theories
typically involve contact with Old World societies. Although these speculations
have become somewhat well-known within popular culture, particularly the idea
of an African connection to the Olmec, they are not considered credible by the
majority of researchers of Mesoamerica.
The great majority of scholars who specialize
in Mesoamerican history, archaeology and linguistics remain unconvinced by
alternative origin speculations. Many are more critical and regard the
promotion of such unfounded theories as a form of ethnocentric racism at the
expense of indigenous Americans. The consensus view maintained across
publications in peer-reviewed academic journals that are concerned with
Mesoamerican and other pre-Columbian research is that the Olmec and their
achievements arose from influences and traditions that were wholly indigenous
to the region, or at least the New World, and there is no reliable material evidence
to suggest otherwise. They, and their neighbouring cultures with whom they had
contact, developed their own characters which were founded entirely on a
remarkably interlinked and ancient cultural and agricultural heritage that was
locally shared, but arose quite independently of any extra-hemispheric
influences.
African origins:
Some writers claim that the Olmecs were
related to peoples of Africa based primarily on their interpretation of facial
features of Olmec statues. They additionally contend that epigraphical,
genetic, and osteological evidence supports their claims.[citation needed] The
idea was first suggested by José Melgar, who discovered the first colossal head
at Hueyapan (now Tres Zapotes) in 1862 and subsequently published two papers
that attributed this head to a "Negro race." The view was espoused
in the early 20th century by Leo Wiener and others.[6] Some modern proponents
such as Ivan van Sertima and Clyde Ahmad Winters have identified the Olmecs
with the Mandé people of West Africa.
Epigraphic evidence:
Some researchers claim that the Mesoamerican
writing systems are related to African scripts. In the early 19th century,
Constantine Samuel Rafinesque proposed that the Mayan inscriptions were
probably related to the Libyco-Berber writing of Africa. Leo Wiener and
others claim that various Olmec and Epi-Olmec symbols are similar to those
found in the Vai script (a relatively modern script in Liberia which may have
Cherokee influence), in particular, the symbols on the Tuxtla Statuette, Teo
Mask,[citation needed] Cascajal Block,[citation needed] and the celts in
Offering 4 at La Venta.
These assertions have found no support among
Mesoamerican researchers. While mainstream scholars have made significant
progress translating the Maya script, researchers have yet to translate Olmec
glyphs.
Genetic evidence:
Genetic and immunological studies over the
past two decades have failed to yield evidence of precolumbian African
contributions to the indigenous populations of the Americas.
Credits: Wikipedia
No comments:
Post a Comment